Which of the following statements best supports the results from the study?

Which of the following statements best supports the results from the study?

The results of the study show that the sika deer outcompeted the white-tailed deer for food. The best statement that supports this is:

The sika deer population more than doubled after the eight years, while the white-tailed deer population decreased by 50 percent.

This statement shows that the sika deer were able to reproduce and grow their population, while the white-tailed deer population declined. This suggests that the sika deer were more successful at finding food and competing for resources.

The other statements do not directly support the results of the study. For example, the statement "The sika deer are larger than the white-tailed deer" does not explain why the sika deer were able to outcompete the white-tailed deer for food. The statement "The sika deer are more aggressive than the white-tailed deer" is also possible, but it is not directly supported by the results of the study.

Therefore, the best statement that supports the results from the study is: The sika deer population more than doubled after the eight years, while the white-tailed deer population decreased by 50 percent.